The last post?
Louise's generous comment on my work has given me food for thought. Why do we post on POL? To solicit criticism or praise - certainly. For the sheer pleasure of seeing our work online - why not? But I suspect that when we post, each of us (regardless of our skills and aspirations) is doing so mainly because we've laboured over and created something that fulfils - and often surprises! - us, and that we'd like to share with others. Praise is no problem; humans seldom tire of it. But how much criticism can we take? If I don't like a painting, is it better remain silent or to be honest and say so. And then where do we draw the line between objectivity and subjectivity, taste and ability: "I don't like this because I find landscapes repetitive and tedious" or "I don't like this because the perspective is rubbish and the washes are muddy"? Critical objectivity is a myth, but we have a duty to be objective about our own feelings. Regardless of these, we can always learn from the work of others - whether we admire it or not. Given two choices however, Louise cleverly introduces a third: "I don't feel qualified to comment on your work". In other words, "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent". On one hand I'm flattered, but on the other disappointed. I'm not a hard-bitten professional. I post on POL for exactly same reasons as everyone else: not arrogance, but a pinch of self-gratification, the need for objective input and the urge to share. I graft and struggle (like the two peasant women in this painting) and for each painting I'm satisfied with, five are torn up. Watercolour is a great cure for quick fixes and presumptiousness: it's about stoicism, application and passion. On the plus side, it's not a solitary activity: your painting partner - Water - is always there to contribute or curse, sabotage or surprise, never passive, always pro-active. Thanks to you all for your support and patience.
Comments
Login or register to add a comment