Copyright

Copyright

Your views on copyright please. I always find this an interesting subject in all aspects of life but here it specifically relates to the art world and in particular our amateur world of art. Please share your views......

Copyright can be a complex subject and in the main I generally find that the winners with copyright in life are the legal profession. Ive seen very few lawyers walking around with holes in their shoes however ive noticed a few artists with their rear ends hanging out of their trousers!! Such a fair and just world but I digress at even this early stage of a blog!! Copyright seems to be not only complex but even more debatable with art. For example who doesn't commence art by trying to copy the work of another artist or try and pass off their work as their own. Like the issue of plagiarism I have always found for example with university work it can be difficult to discover words of your own within a certain subject and I suppose art is not that different. We gather inspiration from all around us and the world so who really owns it or is it first come first served? I recall a sketch on TV where two males fighting over a girl one said.... oh I saw her first and the other replies oh that's ok then but exactly how does that work!! The artist I have followed Terry Harrison seems happy and explains his position below after I made an enquiry regarding selling my copied work on behalf of charity "People worry about copyright issues. As far as I'm concerned, I have created these tutorial projects in order that you have a go at them. If you achieve pictures that you are happy with, then sign them as your own, frame them and exhibit them, then I am delighted. If you intend to sell them it is polite to sign after, under or near your own signature "after Terry Harrison" or 'inspired by Terry Harrison' If you like any of my paintings and fancy 'having a go', please do. As soon as you sign a 'copied work' as your own it is always polite to acknowledge the original artist, otherwise you may be accused of "passing off" as someone else. All artists get ideas from the world around us, but to specifically copy another artists work should be acknowledged, all be it in a small way. Enjoy your painting, I do hope my work encourages you." Is this the position that you would take if you are a commericial artist yourself? or would it differ? I suppose some lawyers would be horrified to read the above. Ive done similarly with the work of Donald Mc Gill ie made an enquiry to the copyright holder to establish their standpoint on selling his copied work for charity and I have received back a similar reply that as far as they are concerned there are no issues if I do this. Has anyone here experienced issues of copyright with other artists? I would be deeply embarrassed and honoured if someone tried to copy my poor work but I fully understand that professional artists have to make a living and could be more aggressive and have every legal right to do so if their work is compromised in this way. What are your thought on the world of copyright and has it ever restricted your choice of work?
Content continues after advertisements
Comments

Yes adele I hope others will add their contributions

My earlier work was copied and it was for my own purposes, i.e. decorating my own walls. But when we replaced them with new ones I had done, we took them to local charity shops because it seemed a shame to bin them. Then there was more talk of copyright and even giving to charity shops was a grey issue, so I always put a little sticker on the back saying who the original artist was. Nowadays I am even more careful and I bin the old ones. A lot of my work is now my own as I got more confident and these I always give to charity. I do copy some paintings still but that is because I have some very lovely books with paintings I would like to reproduce for my own pleasure. Maybe I will think twice about throwing them away in future and start giving them to the charity shops again. A very interesting subject Paul - and one, I feel that will rumble on forever.

Interesting points raised manashree which I agree with. Whilst its understandable artists have to make a living if they are full time I do believe sometimes this can stretch into arrogance quite easily. Personally those I don't have any time for but ones that are genuine and prepared to be flexible which I believe are the majority then I think they are for the most part happy to share their work. Its always polite to ask if you are going to venture into something like this and causes less misubnderstandings in future. If it keeps the legal profession not as profitable then it keeps me happy at least!!

For me copyright is a horrible mark on painting. Whenever I look at the painting having this typical c circled I feel that, this must be belonging to professional artist. My thoughts immediately changes. Even before commenting on this site also I think twice, as for me professional artist are those who are skilled and masters in their particular subjects and i feel so inferior. But its required these days who are working really hard and for those whose art is their bread and butter. Its necessary otherwise its can be misused. I do write my Gallery name that is Bosom Mitra in my paintings and do have a logo of it. I even do have my whole portfolio and content written in each page with logo as a mark and signature, but for me, its a dedication to my love that is Bosom Mitra ( it means bestest buddy) who is my inspiration. I am not a professional artist nor I sell but when I write it I feel happy and to show uniqueness I have created a logo as well. Usually artist make a signature or mention date or name of painting but I never do it and instead of that I write my gallery name and which is purely for the purpose of dedication and love.. Even if it would be a source of income in future then also i will not have a copyright mark. I believe in spreading love in the form of art.