Thank you for your report!
We have received your report and it is currently under investigation by a forum moderator.
Work in Progress. Plein Air painting.
Welcome to the forum.
Here you can discuss all things art with like-minded artists, join regular painting challenges, ask questions, buy and sell art materials and much more.
Make sure you sign in or register to join the discussions.
Message
Posted
At last, an opportunity for Plein air painting at our art group this morning, thanks to a beautiful sunny day which was actually warm enough to sit out!
We painted outside the village hall, where there is a quite big grass area with playground, surrounded by other farmed fields, and some houses behind the trees on the left. I started with a rough sketch picking out the darkest tones. I want this to be show different tonal values rather than an accurate depiction of the scene.
I then concentrated on more of the darker areas and then some lighter tones.
I haven’t cropped the photo so that you get a little feel of the scene and the day.
Plein air painting to me is as much about capturing a feel of the place and weather etc, as an accurate rendition.
Adding in the sky….and part of the houses through the trees.
I
Looking at this now I realise that the houses and trees are totally inaccurate! Does it matter? It wasn’t supposed to be a copy, just an image of the scene, but even so, does it make sense as a painting if you haven’t seen the actual view? Again I’m not sure and will sit on it for a day or two before I do any more.
I’m reasonably happy with it at this stage. The sun has disappeared and I’m not on the scene any more so will leave it and consider for a day or two, let it rest.
What do you think? Comments, advice welcome.
I then concentrated on more of the darker areas and then some lighter tones.
I haven’t cropped the photo so that you get a little feel of the scene and the day.
Plein air painting to me is as much about capturing a feel of the place and weather etc, as an accurate rendition.
Adding in the sky….and part of the houses through the trees.
I
Looking at this now I realise that the houses and trees are totally inaccurate! Does it matter? It wasn’t supposed to be a copy, just an image of the scene, but even so, does it make sense as a painting if you haven’t seen the actual view? Again I’m not sure and will sit on it for a day or two before I do any more.
I’m reasonably happy with it at this stage. The sun has disappeared and I’m not on the scene any more so will leave it and consider for a day or two, let it rest.
What do you think? Comments, advice welcome.Edited
by Tessa Gwynne
Posted
Having not seen the scene , that’s a mouth full, it make sense as a painting. The houses that I can see through the trees fit and sit well into the view , I love the lights and contrasting colours. Your been a bit hard on yourself Tessa as you know it’s not the exact scene, but it’s your interpretation and it certainly looks good .
Posted
Thank you Marjorie and Dixie. I’m not entirely sure where to go with it from here. That’s the problem with Plein air painting- weather and light! That’s also why I enjoy the challenge of it.
It would be no use going back to it on a dull day, having got this far in strong sunlight. I didn’t mention I had sunglasses on while painting this morning. 😆
Probably best to finish it in my own garden on a bright day.
Posted
I don't think paintings generally need to be accurate representations that a camera could capture - portraiture being an exception. Though if you're going to call a place after a given site, it needs to bear some resemblance to it, or the main objects in the picture do. I don't mind moving trees, hills, houses, especially now I'm old enough to say to anyone who remarks "but it doesn't look like that" something along the lines of "ar, but it did, when I wuz a nipper": they won't usually know any better, though look out for some clever clogs with an historic photograph. And don't go inserting a handy mountain range on the Sussex Downs.
It is a problem for landscape painters - what can you leave out, put in, alter, shift, without seriously misrepresenting a scene; but people do seem to take exception if you just use your imagination with scenes they expect to be representationally reasonably true; seems you can use your imagination as much as you like with abstract pieces, but not with figurative paintings.
Plein air - well, I don't do it any more, for physical reasons, but a common approach is to seize the scene as you see it**, and either call that it, or build it up further in the studio, or use the sketch as the basis for a new studio painting. See Andrew Barrowman on YouTube - former postman, now living on his painting, I believe, with help from his dog, Basil: he WORKS at it, mind! Also, a peek over the Atlantic at the work of Roger Bansemer, also available on YouTube - he'll often work in the open air, and refine and complete back in the studio.
If you want to keep the light constant in a plein air painting, one approach is to come back another day, at the same time and with similar weather conditions, after a few hours' work. Because the light WILL change, dramatically, on a sunny day particularly. The last thing you want (and I've seen 'em) is a painting with light coming from all directions, shadows crossing over each other, as if there were three suns out.
** That, young Dixie Dean, is a mouthful!
Posted
Some useful points Robert thank you. I have looked at Andrew Barrowman’s work previously when you mentioned him, and will take a look at Roger B.
I think one of the joys of plein air work personally is that I will remember the day, who I was with, and in this case the dozens of little bees which were on the grass around us! We also saw a thrush which is rare these days, and so a piece of work becomes a mix of memories for the artist.
Posted
I like the way this has developed. The greens are so restful and you seem to have captured the essence of the place. I've done very little plain air myself, but I did one last year and there are often distractions you don't have in a studio (and the sky moves!), so you're very brave methinks!
Posted
The point about painting in a group - yes, and I'd still paint en plein if I had someone to do it with who could drive, and compensate for those things I can't do; but I am a bit out in the wilds, and most of the painting clubs/societies seem to be based in the towns. I can see the attraction, though - encourages you to get out and work, apart from anything else.
Posted
Thank you Bill and Robert. I guess the advantage of yesterday was that we were only just outside our village hall, so coffee and loo easily available! Although I’m keen on Plein air in the middle of nowhere, it limits the time I would spend at it. Also I live on the edge of a very touristy village. I would love to paint in the centre but know it would mean a constant stream of chat and over the shoulder viewers, and it would be very slow progress.
It is good to have someone else to accompany you painting out. I think it’s something that we have got out of the habit of during the last few years of lockdowns etc..
Posted
Good job Tessa, it’s great to get out and paint, personally I prefer my own company as opposed to being in a group! I can get on with it rather than irritating chatter!
However, I can’t make too many suggestions as I don’t have a photo of the view that you’re looking at, I wish you had posted that!
But… there’s a lot of green! Never easy as we all know… I would work over the foreground in particular, using a deep blue green purple as an invented shadow - leave a few small lighter patches as in a dappled sunlight effect. It will give the painting a solid base and give the illusion of pushing everything back a touch.
Those trees would be better if they were much darker, I don’t mean silhouette but darker, they’re against a light sky with the light directly behind them and left…I think!
I can’t see any houses! they would have broken up those greens and given another patch of colour ie orange roofs/ white walls or whatever… I think you’ve missed an opportunity here!
I always like some degree of accuracy of the vista in front of me, as well as capturing something of the ambiance of the scene which I’m sure you have!
These aren’t criticisms, just my immediate observations… you’ve done very well here generally. And… you did ask for critique!
Edited
by Alan Bickley
Posted
Thank you Denise and many thanks Alan. I’ve been out and about so have just seen this. Yes I did ask for critique and am always glad of your advice as I know a lot of your excellent work is Plein air. The only photo I currently have which includes at least part of the view is this.
You will see that I’ve been selective about what I’ve painted and standing back now I see many mistakes in terms of the scale of the trees etc..
trees too short, houses too big!
Having got to the stage I have, I’m not sure I can alter that much. I think it has become what it has, and don’t want to alter too much. I was trying to pick out the dark tones and shapes in particular to start off with.
I take your point re the foreground and will work on that, also the darkening of the trees to push back. Much food for thought, thank you!
PS yes there’s a lot of green. 🥲
You will see that I’ve been selective about what I’ve painted and standing back now I see many mistakes in terms of the scale of the trees etc..
trees too short, houses too big!
Having got to the stage I have, I’m not sure I can alter that much. I think it has become what it has, and don’t want to alter too much. I was trying to pick out the dark tones and shapes in particular to start off with.
I take your point re the foreground and will work on that, also the darkening of the trees to push back. Much food for thought, thank you!
PS yes there’s a lot of green. 🥲
Edited
by Tessa Gwynne
