Combining Chalk and Oil pastels

Welcome to the forum.

Here you can discuss all things art with like-minded artists, join regular painting challenges, ask questions, buy and sell art materials and much more.

Make sure you sign in or register to join the discussions.

Hang on Studio Wall
Showing page 4 of 6
Message
Hi Bill. I’ve never used oil pastels but use soft pastels. I stared with Inscribe pastels a few years ago which are very chalky and dusty,and relatively hard. I’ve invested a lot in Unison pastels which are expensive but full of pigment and vibrant. Having said that I do still at times use some inscribe pastels alongside Unison. It’s usually recommended to work from dark to light, putting highlights on last. If you have different makes of pastels, harder ones are used first with the softest last. I think your flowers need more tones of differing shades and look very similar to each other,whereas they would differ dependant on shade and light. I have also found that the paper you use makes a big difference. Clairefontaine Pastelmat, Canson mi-teintes “touch “ are two which have a great “tooth” and mean you can put lots of layers of pastel on without using fixative. I hope that helps a little! I must admit I’ve never mixed soft and oil pastels, but have used pastels over watercolour or acrylics .
Christine Rogan on 09/06/2023 13:29:25
Hi Christine. Thanks for your advice. I'd never mixed oil and chalk pastel before either. I only did it out of desperation and my very limited holiday palette. I don't think I'll be doing it again. You're right about the flowers. I just couldn't get much colour onto the paper, so there was little room for subtlety. I've almost never painted flowers anyway, so my lack of experience there probably shows. They need a lot more detail and shading, as you say. It's good to get the advice of other painters though. I've never had that before, so I appreciate this forum and the community of mature souls here (I'm not talking about age, incidentally!). 
Hi Bill , liked the way it turned out. In your opening statement, you asked the question, is it a painting, or is it a drawing?  I have been told , in a couple of classes I have attended, that it is a drawing if you can see a lot of the original surface it the end product, It becomes a painting if everything is covered in pastel.  How true this is I don’t know, but that is how it was explained to me. I believe the same applies to a sketch and a drawing.
Hi Bill , liked the way it turned out. In your opening statement, you asked the question, is it a painting, or is it a drawing?  I have been told , in a couple of classes I have attended, that it is a drawing if you can see a lot of the original surface it the end product, It becomes a painting if everything is covered in pastel.  How true this is I don’t know, but that is how it was explained to me. I believe the same applies to a sketch and a drawing.
Alan Beresford on 11/06/2023 13:57:04
Hi Alan. Thanks for that. The definition seems reasonable, although of course it depends on where you begin. Pastels, charcoal and pencils are a stick of dry colour you draw over a surface, hence drawing. A paintbrush does the same but has to be dipped in wet colour, ie paint, hence painting. By that definition pastels are drawings. I don't really care either way though. It is what it is. 
After we came back from our holidays I found an old set of soft pastels (Inscribe) that I got for my 21st birthday (a mere 43 years ago). They're still in great condition, so I finished it off with those, taking all your comments and suggestions into account. I'm still not completely happy with it, but sometimes you just have to let go, so here it is anyway.
I'd be strongly inclined to step away now!  You're in danger of giving the foreground and middleground equal prominence - Alan B is better at explaining this than I am, but I would say nonetheless that if that blue in the water were a bit more tonally restrained, it would fit in better with the overall warmth of the picture.  I'm not entirely convinced by the ripples, either - but that's just the sort of thing I have most trouble with myself, so perhaps I've looked at the painting and isolated a bit of it to suit my own insecurities... As for painting-or-drawing - the distinction doesn't really matter, but if you're applying solid blocks of colour, that's painting.  
You can definitely overwork a painting, I try and avoid this myself, but I’ve been guilty of it in the past! Less is often more… ridiculous statement I suppose, but it’s something I’m trying to adopt of late! Definitely, as my learned colleague has pointed out, the blue water does need toning down a bit, quite a bit actually! The ripples are probably too pronounced, but acceptable. One of the problems with working and painstakingly copying from a photograph, and is something that crops up regularly on here, is that photos are generally devoid of any tonal contrast… it’s the nature of the beast… they can be flat looking and lifeless ! I’ve taken the liberty of converting the painting, or drawing if you like, into greyscale. There is no better way of assessing your progress or evaluating the final result. It does look a bit similar in tone… I won’t elaborate as you can see for yourself. Saying that, the finished product is very commendable, I’m just nitpicking, it’s all minor stuff, but only to help, and certainly not to be derogatory in any way  - critique can be invaluable if it comes from the right source, Robert is one of those sources that I always welcome!

Edited
by Alan Bickley

I'd be strongly inclined to step away now!  You're in danger of giving the foreground and middleground equal prominence - Alan B is better at explaining this than I am, but I would say nonetheless that if that blue in the water were a bit more tonally restrained, it would fit in better with the overall warmth of the picture.  I'm not entirely convinced by the ripples, either - but that's just the sort of thing I have most trouble with myself, so perhaps I've looked at the painting and isolated a bit of it to suit my own insecurities... As for painting-or-drawing - the distinction doesn't really matter, but if you're applying solid blocks of colour, that's painting.  
Robert Jones, NAPA on 17/06/2023 11:24:44
Yes, you're right about the water. It is a little too blue. I did it quickly and only had the cheap white, so scratched out the waves as best I could. AH well, they don't all turn out how you want. I'm a student - no doubt about that!
You can definitely overwork a painting, I try and avoid this myself, but I’ve been guilty of it in the past! Less is often more… ridiculous statement I suppose, but it’s something I’m trying to adopt of late! Definitely, as my learned colleague has pointed out, the blue water does need toning down a bit, quite a bit actually! The ripples are probably too pronounced, but acceptable. One of the problems with working and painstakingly copying from a photograph, and is something that crops up regularly on here, is that photos are generally devoid of any tonal contrast… it’s the nature of the beast… they can be flat looking and lifeless ! I’ve taken the liberty of converting the painting, or drawing if you like, into greyscale. There is no better way of assessing your progress or evaluating the final result. It does look a bit similar in tone… I won’t elaborate as you can see for yourself. Saying that, the finished product is very commendable, I’m just nitpicking, it’s all minor stuff, but only to help, and certainly not to be derogatory in any way  - critique can be invaluable if it comes from the right source, Robert is one of those sources that I always welcome!
Alan Bickley on 17/06/2023 12:15:52
Yes, there is a lack of tonal contrast. It's one of my greatest failings as a painter and something of which I only gradually became aware, as I compared my work with that of others. I think you're both right about the water, which I'll tone down. But this has been a useful learning experience, so I thank you both for your input. It's always a good idea to take advice from more experienced and talented artists and see constructive criticism as a gift - which of course it is. 
IThanks Bill! My comments are made to be helpful and constructive, and you’ve taken the advice of both Robert and myself in the spirit that it was said… There is a long learning curve ahead, but an enjoyable one nonetheless, and any issues that you may currently have, can easily be rectified. The tonal values scenario comes up time and again on here, and it’s probably the most important aspect of achieving a successful result! The good news is that it’s generally an easy fix, the rules are simple, but ignore them at your peril!  There’s loads of useful info on this subject, even on this website, I’ve written whole features for TA on the subject, so shout up if you need anything explained etc… we’re always here to help! Just to add… tonal values go hand in hand with aerial perspective, both are important. Between them they help to create the illusion that we’re looking at a three dimensional image, when we know that it’s two dimensional.

Edited
by Alan Bickley

You are right Bill, I have always taken advice from members on here and especially Alan and Robert since I began painting because I really didn't have a clue about anything. Constructive criticism is a welcomed part of the learning experience. Taking advice from the experienced members definitely helps you develop and grow.
You are right Bill, I have always taken advice from members on here and especially Alan and Robert since I began painting because I really didn't have a clue about anything. Constructive criticism is a welcomed part of the learning experience. Taking advice from the experienced members definitely helps you develop and grow.
Denise Cat on 18/06/2023 09:53:09
Yes, I agree. The point is to learn to do better and to support and encourage each other - that makes us a true community of like-minded souls, all on the same journey. 
Glad you both think this way - I don't claim to be a great artist (mind you - you are ENTIRELY free to disagree with my modest assessment!) but I do have very many years of experience, and passing on what I have learned is a pleasure to do.  Alan has the additional advantage of an art education, whereas I learned after years (and years!) of educating myself: and he has a way with different media, wide learning and experience, and an ability to explain himself, which I envy.   I'm sure it gives him as much pleasure as it gives me to be able to suggest a way through the compositional thickets and the brier-patch of confusion!
Showing page 4 of 6