Thank you for your report!
We have received your report and it is currently under investigation by a forum moderator.
Emin again
Welcome to the forum.
Here you can discuss all things art with like-minded artists, join regular painting challenges, ask questions, buy and sell art materials and much more.
Make sure you sign in or register to join the discussions.
Message
Posted
I like it! I’m not going into the reasons, let’s just say that we all view and interpret art differently! I’m not interested in a photographic interpretation, this definitely isn’t that in any way… stating the obvious here…
And no, the bed was pure garbage…
I didn’t read the article in the Guardian, nor will I because it isn’t my political bias, but they’re also entitled to their opinions… good, bad or indifferent!
Posted
Peter, he’s an art critic, that’s his job. I think we know that it’s his “ opinion” and we can disagree without getting worked up about it. He also sees art “ in the flesh” which is very different from seeing it “ second hand”. It may make an impression, who knows? We certainly don’t, we haven’t seen it ( or perhaps you have?).
Posted
It's one of the best things she's done in this particular discipline - of course, she works in others, and in the others she doesn't generally do anything for me; though I quite liked her bronze doors. I read Jonathan Jones' article - he's a man with whom I've often disagreed; he wrote an article on Maggie Hambling which went beyond art criticism into a vengeful rant. But I agree with Marjorie and Denise that he's a critic; that's his job - the Hambling article was unprofessional, bad criticism, bad journalism; but it was an exception.
The Jesus piece has impact, is well composed, and very sorry chaps, but I like it, and agree with Alan and Martin - she will always divide opinion, I suspect.
Posted
I usually try to check on an artists early work to understand why their later work is rated highly. Obvious examples are that of Picasso, Hockney etc. Sort of...they've proved they can paint, now they have latitude to experiment.
I couldn't find much of Emin's work that offers that proof to me. However, I do like her as a representative of modern women artists.
What I did find in my Google search, was this!
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2020/nov/23/tracey-emin-unseen-paintings-bed-margate-first-time
Where our J.J. is credited at the bottom with a book about the lady herself...
Posted
Yes, well - she was in the right place, met the right people, had a lot of determination, made a lot of money. Art DOES polarize - it always has, it always will unless AI swamps every individual voice and vision in a sea of tat: I don't get annoyed with Emin - much - because I see so many credulous admirers of what are obviously AI images (rarely here): I'm increasingly avoiding Facebook, because this rubbish is all over it, invading what were once interesting pages with their "van Goghs" and other grossly misrepresented artists; I can put up with anything avant garde - if it's any good it'll endure, if it isn't it won't - but people need to stop showering praise on stuff that looks initially bright and cheerful until you take a really good look at it.
In short: let us hold fire on actual artists, whether we like and appreciate them or not, and concentrate on the real threat to artists of all kinds everywhere, which is the march of AI - posterity, the process of time, will take care of the rest.
