Thank you for your report!
We have received your report and it is currently under investigation by a forum moderator.
Copyrighting our images?
Welcome to the forum.
Here you can discuss all things art with like-minded artists, join regular painting challenges, ask questions, buy and sell art materials and much more.
Make sure you sign in or register to join the discussions.
Showing page 1 of 2
- 1
- 2
Message
Posted
This has been addressed before, but finding old threads can be a bit wearisome. However, we do have a lawyer on the strength, one Michael, who might reply. In general, you don't need to copyright your work, so far as I remember. So long as it's plainly yours, signed or marked in some way, the copyright is yours without your having to do anything.
To see old posts on the subject, just type "copyright" into the Search engine on this page.
Edited
by Robert Jones, NAPA
Posted
In simple terms, here in the Uk copyright is automatically, ipso juri, vested in the artist/author. Strictly there is no need to take any further action. By placing something like 'Michael Edwards (c) December 2020' against anything produced serves to warn any potential plagiarist that the artist is aware of the law so beware but it is no more than good practice. I use this when writing poetry.
But we are talking here about works of art and I guess the concern is if someone copies your work. If you want to take action against a copyist it will rest with you to demonstrate that your work predates the copy. If you've posted it here on POL it's easy: simply point to this site. Publication is one the best tools available.
Photos of the work accompanying an email will help. Being imaginative, if you are really concerned, take a photo and send it by email to a third party- your Solicitor for example - and make sure they keep a record.
Copies of documents etc (properly dated of course) lodged with a lawyer is a well recognised method of protecting copyright.
Posted
Another thought has just come to me - when you sell a work of art the copyright remains with the originator - you the artist - unless you have expressly granted copyright to the purchaser.
When I designed the album cover which I recently posted (and seems somehow to have got deleted from the gallery) I stipulated that part of the deal was that they send me copies of anything they produced that included the images - I have in the last few days received a package of vinyls, cards, and CDs which I'm really chuffed with.
Anyway the point is I gave them free copyright to use my paintings for the album and all promotional work in connection with the album but not further or otherwise. This is an important issue to remember when working for anyone other than a private individual where no free copyright is bestowed on the purchaser.
Posted
Thankyou Michael for your expert advice.
Linda, i should have made myself clearer, yes i did mean how can we stop our images from being used elsewhere. 'Paint' used to have a feature whereby i could add a discreet copyright message over the painting , but windows 10 hasn't anything like that.
Posted
Well of course it’s fairly easy to remove, depending on the actual complexity of the overprint. Photoshop has an airbrush tool as most of us know and is relatively easy to master.
However, web photos are 72 DPI, magazine quality is printed at 300 DPI so it’s not that beneficial for someone to use one of our web images for quality reproduction such as cards etc.
Personally, I don’t worry about it! There’s little we can do to prevent it happening.
Posted
When is copyright invoked ? . My initial understanding was a like for like copy full stop. But I posted a painting on here some years ago ,not too long afterwards a painting appeared with exactly the same concept. The colours were different and it wasn’t like for like. It was figurative in a particular setting and it was reproduced in this way . I know we can all paint a daffodil a famous view a well known personality and I understand how that cannot become “ copied” . But in this case it was the actual concept. Hopefully This makes sense.
Edited
by Sylvia Evans
Showing page 1 of 2
- 1
- 2
