Thank you for your report!
We have received your report and it is currently under investigation by a forum moderator.
Compare and contrast
Welcome to the forum.
Here you can discuss all things art with like-minded artists, join regular painting challenges, ask questions, buy and sell art materials and much more.
Make sure you sign in or register to join the discussions.
Showing page 1 of 2
- 1
- 2
Message
Posted
This portrait, by Sarah Jane Moon, has just been hung in the National Portrait Gallery - it's of Peter Tatchell, of course. Compare it with the recent portraits by Jonathan Yeo, and observe: the freshness of colour; the treatment of the whole body; the clean flesh tones. I know which approach I prefer, but how about you?
Edited
by Robert Jones, NAPA
Posted
I was about to say the same as Helen - I prefer the full version of the painting, but find the background too distracting, as it is in a lot of her work. I much prefer the portraits by Jonathan Yeo, as below, although admittedly these aren’t recent. There’s very little of his work that I don’t like, with the exception perhaps of his recent portrait of King Charles which I find too large and too red!




Edited
by Jenny Harris
Posted
I agree that the background is not well-judged. On the other hand, the subject isn't concealed beneath a fog of mucky colour; and the flesh tones look more like flesh than Yeo's cow-pat puce. To be honest, I didn't really register the background; and you couldn't describe this as an especially naturalistic portrait: the stool on which Tatchell sits seems to be levitating - still, having met him, years and years ago, this is a pretty accurate impression of both his features and characteristic pose. The longer I look at it - bear in mind, I saw it for the first time this morning, and that was before I'd had my coffee - the more oddities I can see! Still - I prefer its liveliness to what I'm afraid I think of as Yeo's stodge.
Posted
I’m not a portrait artist or big fan but know what I like and disliked, definitely don’t like the background or the sharp edges
As to Yeo I don’t like his most recent work’s part the awful one of King Charles, but I do like the one of the Late Duke of Edinburgh possibly because I admire him as a man and respect his abilities . I had the pleasure of meeting him several times many years ago , sorry I digress but the painting brought up the memories.
Posted
I do not like the background of Sarah's painting, it is far too distracting. I do like the way she has painted the figure. It is lively and interesting. The late Duke painted by Yeo is beautifully painted in every way. His painting of Idris Elba on the other hand isn't working for me. I think it's because of the palette and no contrast between figure and background.
Showing page 1 of 2
- 1
- 2

