Inspiration from favourite artist, Week 9 : Bonus artist Anthony Sheath.

Welcome to the forum.

Here you can discuss all things art with like-minded artists, join regular painting challenges, ask questions, buy and sell art materials and much more.

Make sure you sign in or register to join the discussions.

Hang on Studio Wall
Showing page 1 of 2
Message
Another excellent week , and again two superb artist thanks to Jenny for the introduction. This weekends bonus artist is Anthony Sheath born 1946. His paintings are very clear detailed landscapes , I know some will find then too detailed and a bit idyllic looking , however his skill as a artist can’t be disputed. Another artist I discovered due  to this thread I do like his fresh looking painting and as landscapes and one of my favourite subjects I find I get absorbed in his artwork. So many to choose from but hood you like my selection , the first epithet the cart is my favourite of them all. 
Not familiar with him, but wonderful detail in the right places.  Paul’s first pic is my favourite, but here’s another on a similar theme…
A new artist to me and I have to say his work is not to my taste - too presact with little artistic interpretation and a tad twee but I do admire his  exceptional skill. 
I'm with Michael on this artist: I am not fond of narrative painting when the narrative is this obvious.  But as others (including Michael) have said - wonderful skills on display.  I think my problem with this work is that this painter was born in 1946, not ca. 1876 - but give or take a few costume changes, you wouldn't see much difference in subject and treatment.  Still - he has a lovely sense of colour and light, his draughtsmanship is superlative: and I'm left wondering if the chocolate-box type of representation is really such a bad thing: have we, or some of us, got a touch up ourselves, as it were, on such things - or in better English (far more attuned to the sensibilities of our literate contributors here!) could we get a bit snobbish about it?   As a comparison - http://www.kenbushe.co.uk/html/latest_.html.  Though we never met, I counted Ken as a friend, with whom I corresponded until a matter of weeks before his untimely death from cancer.  His work to me represents the best of modern landscape painting - and although he could be a sentimental man about his pet rabbit (named "Rabbit"), there was nothing even slightly mawkish or sentimental in his paintings.  His skills were easily on a par with those of Anthony Sheath - but I much prefer his approach to painting.   Still - each to their own.  
Paul, I think his paintings are beautiful, they may be a bit chocolate-box, but they have a lovely warmth and a feel good factor to them.  These are some I have picked out. 

Edited
by Jenny Harris

Mmmm incredible skill and draughtsmanship.  But I don't like them. Possibly too pretty ..  
Fatty fingers strike again. 

Edited
by Sylvia Evans

They do seem a bit pretty pretty, but his skill is not in doubt to be able to do such fine detailing I find quite amazing . I do like the last one you put up Jenny. I do remember the chocolate boxes having paintings on them ,  my grandma used to select the chocolates by the picture , didn’t seem to matter what it tasted like . I also remember Bluebird toffees in a round tin with pictures on them , sometimes it was a aircraft or animal , hell I do feel old . 
His skill is certainly wonderful and I do like his trees and general landscape, but they are overall a bit schmalzy for me. My favourites are the first chosen by Dixie of the trees with cart, and Alan’s choice of tree with gate.  Good to see, and another artist I was unaware of (one of many so far!).
I can see why people think them a bit 'pretty' and 'chocolate boxy', yet despite this not being my favourite style of painting, the 3 ladies and a dog coming up the hill (my research tells me it's called 'Summer's Past') is just superb.  The lady picking flowers (can't find the name) which seems to blend realism with a nod to the impressionists in its use of blue, I also find attractive; the foreground light which isn't on the 'subject' works well for me.

Edited
by Tony Auffret

I so agree Tony there is some beautiful work in them and the parts already commented on are lovely. 
I’m a bit up and down with this artist , I love the detailing and wish I could do half a well as him. The trees and the landscapes are brilliant, and his figures are excellent, but I’m not overfond on quite a lot of them there are the exceptions that  shout out to me. I must have a look and see if he does no landscape etc. 
Showing page 1 of 2