Thank you for your report!
We have received your report and it is currently under investigation by a forum moderator.
inspiration from Artists Week 35 , Peder Mork Monsted and Richard Thorn.
Welcome to the forum.
Here you can discuss all things art with like-minded artists, join regular painting challenges, ask questions, buy and sell art materials and much more.
Make sure you sign in or register to join the discussions.
Message
Posted
Just a quick 'un - I'm almost tempted to try those of his techniques that I can see, to produce a painting that could begin to be compared with his: I hope to goodness I have more sense, though.... I remember once trying to write like a novelist I admired (J B Priestly): the results were ludicrous pastiche (I was very young....) - at the very best I could hope to do, that sort of result would undoubtedly ensue in this case: and as I'd be too embarrassed to show it, there's not really much point!
Posted
Lucian, I would have been around 15 - and I applied the criticism to myself. I've more or less stopped trying to write fiction now - I don't have the requisite level of imagination; my writing as a journalist improved greatly when I stopped trying to model myself on others; a caution offered by Priestley himself, in fact (though not directly to me), when he advised that writers should observe, and be true to themselves. I forget his exact words, I shall have to read him again.
Posted
Richard Thorn is a British contemporary watercolour artist who began his painting career in the early 1980’s after a long spell in London as a jazz musician. He paints colourful, dynamic landscapes focusing on light, texture and distance and is constantly searching for new techniques to achieve these goals. “As an artist my goal is not to render a scene or subject solely for its inherent qualities, but to imbue the emotional expressions illicited by nature.”
He trained at Newton Abbot school of art and still lives in that area, and when not working in his studio can be found playing jazz guitar at local music venues.
Posted
First, the critical note = it's "elicited", not "illicited" - unless he's trying to make his work illegal. And the sentence does sound like something a gallery persuaded him to write as an artist's statement, in that its meaning is a touch opaque even without the mis-spelling.
Now to the positive - what a fantastic watercolourist! I haven't time to savour it all at the moment, but will drink it in later.
Posted
Robert, the wording is as it appears on his website - I thought it best to leave as quoted. Did actually wonder whether to include the quote at all - as you say, it does sound like the kind of rather affected statement a gallery might expect!
There’s a very interesting article on his work and painting methods, including extracts from an interview with him, online. If you search ‘seamless expression Richard Thorn’ you’ll find it.
Edited
by Jenny Harris