Thank you for your report!
We have received your report and it is currently under investigation by a forum moderator.
My 1st post here
Welcome to the forum.
Here you can discuss all things art with like-minded artists, join regular painting challenges, ask questions, buy and sell art materials and much more.
Make sure you sign in or register to join the discussions.
Showing page 1 of 2
- 1
- 2
Message
Posted
Welcome!
IYou need to tell us why YOU think it looks ‘off’ to start with! We need a starting point…
From my perspective, I can’t really see what is going on, apart from an awful lot of detailed brush work throughout the piece, with little or no aerial perspective or consideration of tonal values! A focal point? I’m not sure but it’s a complicated composition…
That’s how I read it, but this might be your style of working, we need more information please.
Other members may see it differently than I do, Robert Jones will have an opinion I’m sure…
Edited
by Alan Bickley
Posted
Welcome to POL. I agree with Alan, terrific detail but what do you think it needs?
I’m assuming the tree is on a hill and we are looking down into a waterfall and a bay with hills in the distance. From my totally amateur perspective I think you need to make the background elements simpler (less detail) and tonally weaker to push them back and make the foreground stand out. Objects in the distance should also be slightly bluer .
Edited
by Andrew Roles
Posted
Welcome, first of all.
The first thing to say about your painting is that I like it, and it reminds me of a number of different artists - I'm trying to identify in my mind who they might be (I know one is or was a Russian), but that's hard work because it's your painting not theirs, and you've incorporated elements in your painting which are all your own: the thickness of paint, the precise brushwork.
I think the weakness of it as an image lies in its composition - plus the absence of an obvious light source, and some rather incongruous wavy lines, where you'd expect sharper definition and more horizontal strokes: this is particularly so in the distance, and there's (as Alan pointed out) not a lot of sign of aerial perspective. That can work -but it needs to look like (and be) a deliberate choice, rather than a position arrived at in the process of working on the painting which hasn't been resolved in the final version.
It has a lot of potential, though - it's interesting - makes you ask where it is, makes you react to it; it's not something I'd just pass by with a cursory glance if it were on a gallery wall.
Showing page 1 of 2
- 1
- 2



I was making this one



