Thank you for your report!
We have received your report and it is currently under investigation by a forum moderator.
First oil painting.
Welcome to the forum.
Here you can discuss all things art with like-minded artists, join regular painting challenges, ask questions, buy and sell art materials and much more.
Make sure you sign in or register to join the discussions.
Showing page 2 of 2
- 1
- 2
Message
Posted
Being able to work into wet paint can and often is advantageous for portrait painting - in fact any subject! So oils are the obvious choice when compared with acrylic.
Easier to demonstrate the multiple reasons than explain them, but it’s a well known fact.
Not always of course, there are times when you need to work over a dried surface. Obviously, this method won’t suit everyone, trial and error is the name of the game here.
Posted
The le Brun portrait is now right next to Ruben's Portrait of Susanna Lunden "Straw Hat' as part of the National Gallery rehang, which I managed to pop in and see before I went away for a few days. Apparently she painted it in response to the Lunden as it wasn't really a straw Hat in the Ruben's picture.
Great to see your own interpretation Peter.
I think hers' is the better of the two in the National
Edited
by Norrette Moore
Posted
I've stuck with the oils and have now done three landscapes and three portraits but once they are dry for the life of me I can't tell the difference between them and similar pictures done with acrylics. They take for ever to dry and have to be stored somewhere while they are doing it and yet there seems to be no advantage in using them.
Before I give them away to members of the art group on Thursday can someone tell me why I should keep them? I must be missing something!
These are the most recent oil paintings I've done. Frankly I could have done them just the same in acrylics.


I have straightened the church since taking the photo!


I have straightened the church since taking the photo!
Edited
by Peter Smith
Posted
There’s fundamental very little difference between the two medium - I’m referring to the finished product here of course, visually that is - it’s the application of paint during painting that is the difference!
I often like to work into wet paint, so obviously I can do that more easily with oils, and this is the main difference for me.
But, I’m equally at home using acrylic, but I do have to adjust my style of painting and I probably subconsciously work more quickly…
I paint fairly thinly so I don’t have to wait too long for my layers to dry, but that’s normally near the end of a painting, when I like to add minimal but necessary detail over a dry surface.
Posted
I'm the opposite Alan, I paint quite thickly. I suppose it all boils down to what suits you and what you enjoy. I didn't find blending any easier with oils Norrette but that's just the way I paint.
I think my oils can go to someone else who will get full use out of them. I'm glad I tried but they are not for me.
Posted
Peter - have you tried interactive acrylics? They have the advantages of regular acrylics, without the very quick drying time - or at least, the drying time can be adjusted (they tell me: I've not used them). You might find them a half-way house between acrylics and oils. I don't want to add to your art expenditure, because as I remember, they're not especially cheap - but maybe if you have a windfall, or have run out of everything else, they'd be worth trying.
I like to use oils, acrylics, watercolour, occasionally gouache, and more recently pastel (still hate the dust). I wouldn't claim to be a Rembrandt in any of them, but I do find you get acclimatized eventually - you fight them, struggle, get frustrated, then one day, bingo! You get it. But I admit there's no point in flogging away at a medium you're really not enjoying.
Showing page 2 of 2
- 1
- 2

