Thank you for your report!
We have received your report and it is currently under investigation by a forum moderator.
Why worse? Someone might have an opinion!
Welcome to the forum.
Here you can discuss all things art with like-minded artists, join regular painting challenges, ask questions, buy and sell art materials and much more.
Make sure you sign in or register to join the discussions.
Message
Posted
At the end of the day as they say it doesn’t matter how you actually achieve the look with or without a grid if the portrait looks good it looks old because everything is where it should be and is proportionately accurate. Superb results are achieved from different way of working, when I look at portrait I immediately like it or think it’s superb I don’t even think about how it was achieved I just admire the skill of the artist , then think I wish I could do something like that . I suppose there is no right way or wrong way just whatever you need to achieve your goal.
Edited
by Paul (Dixie) Dean
Posted
Art today is exceedingly diverse. The point is the sort of art you do gives you pleasure, and satisfaction. Also there are many categories of art of which we all can fit into, the choice is enormous. So you could say art is how it makes you feel not how technical perfect one thinks it has to be. Lastly it is the artist choice to choose the equipment or technology they need to make their art. Embrace it all is my point of view.
This post has been removed as it violates our forum rules and guidelines.
Posted
It occurred to me that 150 years ago all those great artists we so admire weren't drawing grids on photographs! They had to work fairly quickly because their human models would get tired, especially the children.That's true, Peter. But what's equally true, is we don't have photograph to compare the portrait against, for likeness. I think some of those Royal portraits made in pre photo times, are somewhat varied.
