Thank you for your report!
We have received your report and it is currently under investigation by a forum moderator.
Portraits in different media
Welcome to the forum.
Here you can discuss all things art with like-minded artists, join regular painting challenges, ask questions, buy and sell art materials and much more.
Make sure you sign in or register to join the discussions.
Message
Posted
As those who follow my dastardly doings may know, I was commissioned to paint a portrait of Jeremy Corbyn MP - and decided to execute it in acrylic. It has been a struggle - the forum member who suggested I'd have problems with his facial hair was spot-on! - and while I've achieved the sort of image you might find on a trade union banner, I wished I'd followed Alan Bickley's gentle hint, and painted it in oil.
I've painted few portraits - very few. All but one of them were based on photos; never satisfactory, in any way. You don't want to just copy the photograph, so you try to adjust and adapt it; and without the live model in front of you, this inevitably entails some guess-work. Get it wrong, and you soon understand the definition of a portrait as being a painting in which something went a bit wrong around the mouth....
Having, I suppose, completed the acrylic portrait - I am fully intending a further fiddle, though! - I thought I would have a go with a few oil sketches as well. Why didn't I listen to Alan? Why? They have so much more life - I don't say they're great works, but the malleability of the paint is so ... well, hugely much greater. I used Cremnitz White, yellow ochre, Mars orange, and a a touch of Cadmium Red. The lead white meant that the paint was gloriously 'tacky' after a day's settling down, I used no Turps, just a tiny amount of Linseed oil. And now of course, I want to lay the acrylic to one side and start all over again with a full-sized oil portrait.
I'll take photos of these various bits and pieces asap, and horrify you with them, and will, I think, tackle a full-scale oil; I'll also dig out a portrait I began of a lady back in 1998 - it's in a bit of a state now, but I think the comparison will be of some technical interest, because I used Titanium White rather than lead; I didn't think that worked too well, but I'd like to see this on-screen (which I find more helpful than actually looking at the finished, or in this case half-finished, piece in order to discover the faults in it). I didn't finish the portrait because the lady sadly died very suddenly; it's not a very honest portrait, because she was extremely vain - or just insecure - and I would only have hurt her if I'd painted her as she really was, rather than as she had once been. A fatal compromise, but I'm not the first one to have made it.
I suppose this is why I never really painted portraits - I may have a cruel tongue at times, but not really a cruel nature; I could never, for example, have painted Lucian Freud's portrait of the Queen - he painted what he saw: a bored old lady who had sat for a thousand of these damn' things and was fed up to the back teeth with it. I think perhaps he exaggerated her general dissociation from the whole project; but perhaps better that than Rolf Harris's very competent (I thought) but somewhat reverential version: I shall always treasure the programme in which poor old Rolf was labouring over his creation, got to the mouth, and said "she looks like she's sneering at me" - Harris is an honest painter, whatever his faults may be; perhaps his fault as an artist is a degree of tricksiness, but - not exactly the first to strive for the professional's short-cuts ...dangerous to be seen to be making excuses for him, though, so I shall cease.
Posted
Really interesting to read Robert. Whilst I'd never put myself anywhere near your highly qualified category, portraiture is what I love doing. I entirely agree with you, it's ALWAYS in the mouth for me and I've lost count the number of times I've had to do and re-do. Sometimes I've broken away from the portrait (before starting and during) and worked just on drawing/painting the mouth on a separate bit of canvas until I feel I've really understood it. I started in acrylics and then moved on to oils but I'm happy using both as each has different benefits. I've found that even with acrylics by layering and blending and blending again that I can achieve effects that have surprised some professional artist friends. I'm still at the stage with oils though that I can get frustrated with the slowness and mixed drying times and also how different some oil paints are. The wonderful creamy butteriness of some and others that are sticky and not so malleable. Have found out the hard way that paying that bit extra often is the difference. Anyway, I shall enjoy seeing your Corbyn portrait.
Posted
Mouths can be tricky, think ‘soft edges’ particularly in the corners and you won’t go far wrong!
Mind you, nothing is particularly easy in portraiture/ figure drawing, which is why in my case, a huge amount of college time was spent in the life room. I believe this is no longer the case, which can only be detrimental I fear!
Being able to correct a painting in oils, whatever the subject, is for me a definite advantage - definitely not a problem!
It’s one of the reasons that I paint predominantly with oils, rather than the fast drying properties of acrylic, although acrylic can have certain advantages over oils in some cases.
Edited
by Alan Bickley
