Thank you for your report!
We have received your report and it is currently under investigation by a forum moderator.
Odd colour mixes that work ...
Welcome to the forum.
Here you can discuss all things art with like-minded artists, join regular painting challenges, ask questions, buy and sell art materials and much more.
Make sure you sign in or register to join the discussions.
Showing page 1 of 2
- 1
- 2
Message
Posted
For one, the Zorn palette - Yellow Ochre, Vermillion or Cadmium Red (I strongly suggest the second of those) Ivory Black, and white. It shouldn't work, you might think, but in oil it does; it even works in acrylic, which doesn't always behave in any way similar to oil paint. I've yet to try it in watercolour - I'm not at all sure that black in w/c is going to work; but I can't see any theoretical reason why it shouldn't.
A mix I tried today, in watercolour, was recommended by Jeremy Ford, in a booklet I've recently bought from the Michael Wilcox School of Colour - for flesh, in one of his paintings, he used a mix of Pthalo Green, and Cadmium Red Light: I tried it today, and - it works! I don't know if the painting will come together, I've allowed it and myself a rest overnight, but I see no reason bar my own incompetence why it shouldn't.
Do you have paint mixes that instinct tells you won't work, but in actual fact do? I tend to be a bit conservative in colour-mixing, so would welcome anything you lot out there can come up with as worth a try. The science of it all is suggestive - but perhaps most of us rely more on instinct and past practice than science.
The Michael Wilcox School recommends, and sells, a maximum of 12 colours as being entirely adequate to achieve virtually any colour or tone you wish to achieve: they break down the colours into rational categories - e.g. violet-inclining blue; orange-inclining yellow - and it does work, very well; though I admit to introducing other colours from my dissolute past as an enthusiast for traditional hues. It does save money though - and it does work - if you stick with the Wilcox formula, of White; Burnt Sienna; Quinacridone Violet/Permanent Rose; Cadmium Red Light; Yellow Ochre; Raw Sienna; Cadmium Yellow Light/Pale; Hansa Lemon Yellow; Pthalo Green; Cerulean Blue; Ultramarine; Pthalo Blue. Not a hint of black - but with those Pthalo colours that our wonderful Syd Edward hated with such passion.
Now - I know I've posted something similar to this before: and I'm still not one of Michael Wilcox's shareholders. I do not restrict myself to this palette; I'm fonder of Viridian than of Pthalo Green (both are great mixers: faintly hideous on their own), I would substitute Cobalt Blue for Cerulean (usually), and while I think Pthalo Blue is excellent with watercolours, I prefer Prussian Blue with oils - and marginally, with acrylic. But the principles are the same, when you break them down to green-inclined blue, orange inclined yellow, etc. What profiteth it me to recommend this approach? Well - I've seen SO many student artists who think they need to buy dozens of colours: and this is fiendishly expensive in oil paint - that every now and then, in an uncharacteristic fit of altruism, I feel bound to suggest to beginners AND more experienced painters that you just don't need the 120-plus hues available in the Old Holland range, or the slightly less extensive Winsor and Newton and Talens Rembrandt offerings. In fact, you need - as in really NEED - just 10% (if my maths is right: it rarely is) of that. Think just how much you could save on your next paint purchase if you bore that in mind?
If you can mix your own violet; your own orange; your own greens (very easy with those colours), rather than buy them ready-made in the tube, you could save tens of pounds, and over a year of painting, hundreds of pounds. I know we're all artists, with our heads in the clouds, but that's got to be worth doing, hasn't it?
My paint box contains many more colours than this - a quick look shows me, in oil, Indian Red, Indian Yellow, Light Red, Venetian Red, Cobalt Violet, Mars Violet, Mars Brown, Mars Red, Mars Orange, Chrome Yellow Hue, Cadmium Lemon, Terre Verte, Ivory Black, Rose Madder, Brown Madder Alizarin, Permanent Mauve, Winsor Red, Rowney Golden Yellow, Sap Green - and that's a QUICK look - there are certainly more. And we haven't even touched on the variety of whites I use. A lot of those colours aren't necessary: they can be mixed, and mixed quite easily at that.
Choose the colours you want - as indeed I do. But don't bankrupt yourself if you don't have to: fine if you're as rich as Croesus, but most of us aren't; a limited palette like this will give you greater unity, AND save you maybe a thousand pounds a year, once you tot it all up. In gratitude, you can buy Dawn Farley a birthday present with all the money you've saved!
Posted
Thanks Robert.
I have 'paint mixes that [texts] tells me won't work', but in actual fact - they really don't.
Having read the Wilcox, Blue & Yellow book, I forget to refer to it. I keep reading artists picture demos of which I like the tones & hues, and then try to match them with what I have, and end up with a big fail. And even yesterday I was looking for another red in an effort to get something like Alizarin Crimson when I've already got 4 reds (admittedly two of them came from a Cobra artists starter box).
Some of this problem is down to the manufacturers I believe. Of those you've listed above
I don't have Quinacridone Violet/Permanent Rose - but do have Permanent red violet light (PR202/PW7)
I don't have Cadmium red Light - instead Pyrrole Red (PR254)
I have neither Cadmium Yellow Light/Pale; nor Hansa Lemon Yellow - just Permanent yellow Light (PY154) or a Cad yellow deep.
I don't have the Pthalos (but have just discovered the joys of Prussian Blue)
my greens are SAP & Permanent green Deep (PG7/PY154)
I need to waste some surfaces and trial out my palette from those which I have, I think.
Posted
Perhaps I'm odd...no wisecracks please. But I use very small boxes of a small amount of paints (watercolour) I also have a limited amount of acrylic tubes, my coloured pencil box has stubs of what I use and whole pencils I have never used in over thirty years, I was given a lovely set of 72 pencils.
I never ever remember names apart from red, blue , yellow ....yes some are blue reds, some are yellow reds . I just look and mix from my limited palette/s and it usually works ,well it does for me.. I know it's a learning curve for a lot of people and as I am. Vintage ( Robert knows ) I just "do"it..
What I do ...is look at things when out and about and try to mix the colours I see in my head. I think doing and experimenting works , well it does for me.
Posted
You're quite right Sylvia. New to oils, I thought the colour on the tube might give me an idea, but I've just striped a sheet of oil paper with them and can see some colours are way off. Warm blue hills turned out bright lilac, a green slope was shouty lime. Back to the painting board... :-)
Was going to start a thread on physical palettes. I have a couple of inherited ancient wood ones, but I've been using the disposable type. Is it just me - or are they too slippery?
Posted
A wooden palette is a favourite of mine, for oil at least: I have found the disposable ones too slippery, yes. As for mixing - proportions are important: eg, I'm not sure I'd want to use that pthalo green plus cadmium red for flesh again: it's a bit on the brown and pale side, and gets muddy if you need to strengthen it; but again - the secret will lie in the proportions and thus your (Norrette's) plan to practise on odd bits of paper is probably essential: it's a hard lesson to learn if you mix up the desired colour, apply it, and find it doesn't work on an actual painting. Normally, I'd use burnt sienna, raw sienna, touch of cadmium red, plus whatever I need for shadows, which could be anything from Indian red to Viridian, to Ultramarine.
Syvia, you are perennially youthful! What's more, you have developed an eye for colour after much experience: the fact that you can tell an orange red from a bluish one - not everyone can -is testament to the fact that you've moved beyond the need for formulae and systems.
Oh, and on the subject of red - pyrrole red is marketed as Winsor red by W & N: it's a very good red to have, and I use it quite a bit: cadmium red is more orange: I love it! A discreet splash of either in a painting is a great way to bring it all to life. Quinacridone violet - a lovely colour, a less blue cast than Alizarin Crimson, and much more lightfast - comes to us under a number of guises: Permanent Rose; Rose Madder Hue; Quinacridone Red; Quinacridone Magenta - the identifier we want is PV.19. (Last time I looked, the SAA sold a Rose Madder Hue, I don't think they called it quite that, with a different pigment - which I remember not liking very much: I'd stick to PV.19.)
Posted
Yes, you only need the split primaries + some earth colours, this is very wise advice. But will beginners heed it? Will they, indeed. (I speak from my own experience as a beginner watercolourist). You read about a colour in a book, you saw someone on youtube swear by it, a friend gave you some of theirs, it came in a set, etc. Or then you find out that some pigments you have aren't lightfast, like Alizarin Crimson. You do kind of have to experiment, to find out what you like. For example, this process:
Robert: "I'm fonder of Viridian than of Pthalo Green (both are great mixers: faintly hideous on their own), I would substitute Cobalt Blue for Cerulean (usually)"You can, of course, only find out which you are fonder of, if you have the opportunity to try out both. Additions that worked well for me with my split primary palette: Light Red (I read about this pigment in books by older landscape artists like Rowland Hilder) and Viridian and Cobalt Teal. My mistakes, languishing in a drawer: Dioxazine Purple (so overpowering); Quinacridone Orange (what is the point?) and Cobalt Green (so flatly opaque!). It probably wasn't a good idea to buy a colour for it's own sake, I learnt, you need to consider them in relation to other pigments. I should try putting them on my palette and mixing with them. Find some sort of subject that suits them. Find an odd mix for them that works well.
Posted
I do a lot of mixing because sometimes I can't find the colour I want. I will try my own various combinations till I know It's the colour I want. For example, even though I have a lot of greens, I still might mix my own. I mix a lot of various purples using various shades of blue and red. Sometimes I want a grey green or an orange green, I mix some muddy colours, I quite like them, bland with a hint of tint.
Posted
Syvia, you are perennially youthful! What's more, you have developed an eye for colour after much experience: the fact that you can tell an orange red from a bluish one - not everyone can -is testament to the fact that you've moved beyond the need for formulae and systems. Oh, and on the subject of red...Orange or bluish reds, I can't tell the difference between them unless they are next to each other. I know this might sound mad to Sylvia, but the next thing I did was jot down the pigment codes of my samples. Some were combinations of other colours I already have. I also looked up W&N Cadmium reds in their water-mixable oils. *All* of them - light, dark, medium were PR108 - on its own. So I presume the difference was the amount of medium added in the tube? I was shocked, :-) Which makes me wonder if we should stick to pure pigment paints only. Bit late now for me. I also quite like some of the accidental muddy colours Denise.
Edited
by Norrette Moore
Posted
It think it's more the grinding of the pigment than the medium it's ground in, given the amount of medium doesn't vary by much: but I don't make paint, so take that as a very inexpert opinion. PR108 IS a pure pigment - perhaps I've misunderstood what you mean (very likely I've misunderstood what you mean! I'm good at that...). There are cadmium red 'hue' colours available - none of them, irrespective of what their makers say, can match up to genuine cadmium red. Though they have their uses - rather few, in my book.
It's fairly easy to tell orange- and blue-leaning reds apart - colours like Vermilion, Cad Red, Cad Scarlet, Scarlet Lake, tend towards orange (which means they carry an element of yellow, basically) while crimsons tend to blue: which would include Alizarin Crimson, Crimson Lake, Permanent Rose/Quinacridone Red, Violet, Magenta, and a number of others. Pyrrole red/Winsor red has a useful tendency to swing both ways .... if you'll forgive the comparison... It's a rich red of considerable subtlety whose properties others can probably explain better than I can - well worth having in the palette, because it darkens very well, can be enhanced with yellow, to make a rather splendid orange, and modified with blue or green to make violets in the first case and darks with both.
The snag with not knowing which reds will do what arises particularly when it comes to mixing - eg, if you want a bright orange and don't happen to have a tube handy: you'll get very different results from different reds and yellows - it saves a lot of time and paint if you know what will give you the desired result first time.
I recommend the Handprint website for a lot of information on colour - it deals with watercolours, but the chemical composition of the paint is what we should be looking for, and the reliability of the base pigment in each case. I like the site because it doesn't faff about: it tells you very clearly which pigments to avoid, as well as those which should be your first choice.
Posted
Cara - interesting point you raise there, eg Quinacridone orange, 'what's the point?'. There are a good many colours that are packaged for convenience which could easily be made by elementary colour mixing, Quin orange being one, Cadmium orange another. I'd defend Quinacridone gold, though (not that it's been attacked): it would be very hard to get near to a colour mix equalling it. It's instructive to take a close look at paint labels - if you see your tube of Indigo is actually a mix of, say, Pthalo Blue and Black - and you've got both in your regular palette, there's not much point in buying tube Indigo: and the real thing is fugitive anyway.
Dioxazine Purple - I agree with you entirely! Cobalt Green - the painter David Curtis had an article in The Artist a good few years ago in which he extolled its virtues as one of the only greens you could use out of the tube to represent foliage - I've never used it, the price is a bit steep, but would like to give it a go one of these days. A colour I can well do without is Cadmium Green - a) you can mix it, b) would you really want to? Though it'll vary between makers. Don't care for Cobalt Violet either - which is just as well given its cost: another colour much better mixed in general - though I've seen it very well employed in sunset/sunrise paintings.
Posted
Hello Robert, this is a screen shot of WNs artist quality oils pigment table. Four of the colours have PR108 as a single pigment. It's not a typo as it's the same as the water-mixable oils table. Be interesting to hear from Winsor & Newton, although I believe it might be the same with other manufacturers. You might have to enlarge it.
Edit: Sorry, three of them, the cad orange is a mix


Edited
by Norrette Moore
Showing page 1 of 2
- 1
- 2
