Art a state of mind?

Welcome to the forum.

Here you can discuss all things art with like-minded artists, join regular painting challenges, ask questions, buy and sell art materials and much more.

Make sure you sign in or register to join the discussions.

Hang on Studio Wall
Message
A point was made about states of mind in another thread, and I replied to it without considering it a bit of an irrelevant shoe-horn (my reply, not the original observation). So I'll paste it here, in a nice new slot, because I found the subject interesting  - and others... well;  they MIGHT; you never know.   Here we go: For what it's worth -  half a crown in old money - artists' states of mind vary so much between them that it's hard indeed to draw conclusions; we're discussing L S Lowrey elsewhere, and the point has been made that his paintings seem to have very little to do with his state of mind, and far more to do with his immediate environment.  That still leaves you with the question why - why did he respond to it in paint; where does the creative urge come from; why, as it seems, don't we all have it?  If I were to write a monograph - and don't worry: I won't - I think I'd argue that the creative urge IS alive in most of us, manifesting in very different ways (even designing a filing system is quite creative), that isolating "art" from just "making" may be misleading; and so many other factors are involved - class; opportunity; early influences; environment; historical and political events; sexuality; nationality - that no common root can be observed beyond the fact that we choose to fill our time in possibly numinous ways, according to the talents we might have (and wherever they come from): and if not in numinous then at least in numerous examples. I think about that now and then in relation to my father and grandfather; my father took up painting very late in life, my grandfather had very little aesthetic awareness, at least so far as paintings were concerned, but both made furniture - from the use of which I still  benefit.  That was certainly creative, and sadly, I've not inherited their abilities - I don't think their creativity arose from any state of mind: it was cheaper to build a bedside cabinet than buy one at the time - plus they both enjoyed working with their hands.  Or, to put it another way - we all admire Chippendale, but  no one has ever inquired into the state of mind that led him to design and create beautiful furniture....  I'm confident that I've entirely lost my way in that thicket of ill-digested thoughts, but such as it is - there it is: and you can't say fairer than that....
I do agree that we all have creativity within us often it manifests in different ways not purely art in its many different forms, I think here sculpture, pottery origami etc etc .  My daughter is a very accomplished artist but choose to use her talents in making and decorating cake ,some are literally edible sculptures but it’s very creative work non the less . Robert mentioned his father and grandfather making furniture again needing creative vision to see the design and making the piece of furniture. I don’t think it’s a particularly state of mind nor from my experience of working within the mental health service it’s is particularly linked to a mental health state . A lot of the people I worked with we’re creating some nice artwork etc , because they had the time and and where free from other pressures to be able to do so.  It was a benefit to many as it gave them a focus and was distracting in many was from the problems they were facing. Most need help to develop the skills and Sartre to see how they could create painting , pottery and woodworking it’s didn’t come naturally nor as I was told by several leading psychiatrists a product of their illnesses. Some did produce very dark and sometimes disturbing images, that was sometimes linked to the illness. If I might give an example, a painting was made by a painting who was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, and was occasionally very depressed and became violent, the painting featured quite disturbing images of people and a purple moon with what looked like blood dripping from it. One that  staff was very concerned that he was becoming psychotic and could become violent, they alerted the duty psychiatrist who went to see the patient and I went along as he was one on my patients. We sat with him having a cuppa and discussing his painting , but hadn’t said anything about the concerns expressed, after a while he was asked how come it’s a purple moon that’s bleeding, oh that was because the orange paint was  dirty and I mixed it up so sec the colours I had , the drips were from dribbles of the brush .  All quite logical and innocent, but because of his mental health diagnosis it was  assumed to be something very different. 
I do like your example Paul, doesn't always do to make assumptions, does it.
I was very amused by Paul's last comment - it reminded me of Dalí, asked why he'd painted melting pocket watches - something  to do with observing fried eggs was his reply.  We can read a lot too much into artists' intentions;  or at least, those who write pretentiously about art can; and often do.