Thank you for your report!
We have received your report and it is currently under investigation by a forum moderator.
Info appreciated
Welcome to the forum.
Here you can discuss all things art with like-minded artists, join regular painting challenges, ask questions, buy and sell art materials and much more.
Make sure you sign in or register to join the discussions.
Showing page 2 of 2
- 1
- 2
Message
Posted
Before even thinking of paying £350 for the painting, you really must determine that it IS a painting. I'm not convinced that it is, but I find it impossible to tell on the screen.
Alan is right about the frame, particularly if it is an antique frame - it is worth some money, though it's very hard to say how much. If the painting is a direct copy of the Van Ost - which looks incontrovertible - then yes, if I had it, I might part with £350; even a good print has some value, but we could shave about £300 off the price if that's what it is. Get it valued - unless you're completely bowled over by it and really want it, in which case you'll probably kick yourself if you pass up the chance - because you really need to know what you're paying for.
Posted
It’s more likely to be a print, not even a limited edition and is therefore worth a few pounds at most. Limited edition prints don’t fetch a great deal either, but can depend on the artist of course! If it’s in an ornate, what is known as a Swept frame, (no mitres at the corners), similar style to the one illustrated, then the value lies in the frame, and they can be expensive, depending on age and material.Thanks for your input.
Showing page 2 of 2
- 1
- 2
