Thank you for your report!
We have received your report and it is currently under investigation by a forum moderator.
Miniature Art
Welcome to the forum.
Here you can discuss all things art with like-minded artists, join regular painting challenges, ask questions, buy and sell art materials and much more.
Make sure you sign in or register to join the discussions.
Message
Posted
I first got interested in miniature art after visit to the V & A, where they have a grand selection of work from those eras when such art was used for much the same reasons as we might keep a loved one's photo in our wallet or purse. As an art form it's still going strong with many societies such as the Royal Society of Miniaturists here in the UK.
I've done a few over the years. I've a very large postcard album that takes 480 postcards. A small ambition is to get it filled if I can...only about 200 pics to go! Here's one I did today...
...it's 6 x 4 inches on paper, using a pen and coloured pencils.
6 x 4 inches is the maximum size for a painting to be considered a miniature, although REAL miniaturists often work much smaller and might even consider my pic to be a 'large picture.' They use paper, vellum, and metals like copper and tin. Brushes suitable for miniature painting are available, they hold a reasonable amount of paint and come with very fine tips. It seems ALL the mediums are used...watercolour, gouache, acrylic, oils, pencils and charcoal. Oh, and yes...a large magnifying lens.
I intend to feature modern miniaturists, some of the work seems utterly impossible at such sizes (to me, at least) but it IS done. So let's have a look at some REAL miniaturist artist's work.
The two above are by UK artist Debby Faulkner-Stevens. They are on vellum, and are 2 x 2 inches in size. YES...2 x 2 inches! I'm completely barnswoggled and gob-smacked! How is it even possible? A brilliant artist.
Two by another UK artist Gina Morton. 3 x 2.5 inches. Superb!
Another fabulous UK artist Joyce Rowsell. 3 x 4.5 inches!!
Two pencil miniatures by John Good. I'm not sure I could get a pencil sharp enough to produce such tiny intricate work.
Joyce Rogerson, the frames are traditional for such work. 3 x 2 inches!
I find the work inspirational, and when you consider the size, almost unbelievable. I'm seeing these on my Desktop PC 27 inch screen, where they appear MUCH LARGER than they actually are...and they still look fabulous.
...it's 6 x 4 inches on paper, using a pen and coloured pencils.
6 x 4 inches is the maximum size for a painting to be considered a miniature, although REAL miniaturists often work much smaller and might even consider my pic to be a 'large picture.' They use paper, vellum, and metals like copper and tin. Brushes suitable for miniature painting are available, they hold a reasonable amount of paint and come with very fine tips. It seems ALL the mediums are used...watercolour, gouache, acrylic, oils, pencils and charcoal. Oh, and yes...a large magnifying lens.
I intend to feature modern miniaturists, some of the work seems utterly impossible at such sizes (to me, at least) but it IS done. So let's have a look at some REAL miniaturist artist's work.
The two above are by UK artist Debby Faulkner-Stevens. They are on vellum, and are 2 x 2 inches in size. YES...2 x 2 inches! I'm completely barnswoggled and gob-smacked! How is it even possible? A brilliant artist.
Two by another UK artist Gina Morton. 3 x 2.5 inches. Superb!
Another fabulous UK artist Joyce Rowsell. 3 x 4.5 inches!!
Two pencil miniatures by John Good. I'm not sure I could get a pencil sharp enough to produce such tiny intricate work.
Joyce Rogerson, the frames are traditional for such work. 3 x 2 inches!
I find the work inspirational, and when you consider the size, almost unbelievable. I'm seeing these on my Desktop PC 27 inch screen, where they appear MUCH LARGER than they actually are...and they still look fabulous.
Posted
They look fantastic Lew , such skilled work, it’s just been suggested that I could have a go , my answer was polite but not sure if I will try . How thy can work at such a tiny scale, even with the aid of magnifying lenses, it’s mind boggling, such a accuracy, some of the brushes must only have a couple of strands to hold the paint .
Posted
Give it a try Paul. I can’t do much at this scale, it has to be very simple pen and coloured pencil stuff. The good thing is they don’t take long even at my current snail’s pace. There’s such fabulous miniature art out there, I might keep this thread going just because it interests and inspires me. But in future I’ll keep my own stuff out of it.
Posted
I think you should add some of your own stuff Lew , that would be inspiring as we know you and your work.
I realise your work will be different to some that you have shared by other artist , by seeing your own work it will demonstrate what can be achieved by a non specialist artist, hope that doesn’t sound like a put down.
Posted
A very long time ago I used a gallery in Wells, Somerset to show my Paintings. One of the artists painted minitures and soon a couple more miniturists joined them and they formed a society that they called The Hilliard Society. What amazed me was that one artist painted tiny Pastel landscape paintings surprisingly not with pastel pencils but with sticks of Soft pastel. They were about 3X2". He provided a magnifying glass so you could look at them. Very skillfully done but I couldn't see the point when you needed a magnifier to look at them. I believe The Hilliard Society still exsists and has gone from strength to strength.
Posted
It does George, I got some of these images from the Hilliard society website. I agree about using a magnifier to VIEW them, although I expect you need one to paint them.
I saw some of Hilliard’s miniatures at the V & A. Didn’t need a magnifier to view them. Little gems. If I were an art collector, I’d love to have some miniatures.
‘
Posted
WOW...what a talented man. So pleased to see your Dad's work. I'm impressed by your 2 x 2 inch painting. I've never been brave enough to attempt that.
The smallest miniatures I've done were these two...
...the Monroe is 4 x 4 inches, and the little girl 4 x 3 inches. These were done some years back before my hands got so wobbly. Some time after I bought a big photo album that takes postcard size pics. Since that all my miniatures have been 6 x 4 inch. Yours is TINY compared to these! Impressed!
...the Monroe is 4 x 4 inches, and the little girl 4 x 3 inches. These were done some years back before my hands got so wobbly. Some time after I bought a big photo album that takes postcard size pics. Since that all my miniatures have been 6 x 4 inch. Yours is TINY compared to these! Impressed!
Posted
Interesting to see these - Tessa, your dad’s are lovely. And I like yours too. I particularly like your Marilyn, Lew. A fair time ago I painted miniatures, I was equally interested in the frames! None left now, I sold them but I still have a few frames left. One fairly recent “ fun painting” was done for a club project. We had to do a miniature but I included them instead in a “ normal” painting. No intricate detail though.


Edited
by Marjorie Firth

The two above are by British artist Bill Mundy.
These are by British illustrator and miniaturist Eric Kincaid (A little more in my neck of the woods) Brilliant work.
Gina Morton tiny masterpiece.
John Good ( 4 x 5 inch).
Joyce Rowsell.
Hope you don’t mind me posting these which were painted by my dad many years ago. The three small ones are about 3”x2”. Obviously they could do with re mounting.
And here’s one of mine that somehow made its way onto the POL FB set up.
