Thank you for your report!
We have received your report and it is currently under investigation by a forum moderator.
New wood block print
Welcome to the forum.
Here you can discuss all things art with like-minded artists, join regular painting challenges, ask questions, buy and sell art materials and much more.
Make sure you sign in or register to join the discussions.
Hang on Studio Wall
This is a Studio member-only feature!
Join our Studio membership and save your favourite Painters Online content, from gallery artwork to step-by-step guides, to your own online mood boards. Create your go-to place for inspiration and learning. Plus, members can also enjoy a range of exciting features including monthly art videos and a digital magazine library.
If you are already a Studio member, simply login to your account.
Not a Studio member? Why not try our free 30-day trial - no commitment, no credit card required
Message
Posted
Interesting question David. And one I dont think can be answered quickly.
People have different tastes and thoughts when it cames to art.
Some are very good other not...a question I have asked many times,
who decides why these famous painting are famous and command
such prices, rediculous prices.
The only answer I can think of at this time is...the art critics and sponcers.
Just like food critics I suppose...too much salt for one critic or not enough for the next and thats it your out.
At the end of the day its only a mediun on a support.
You decide what you like and why, its all in the eye of the beholder
Posted
I think Rowena has it about right. Not sure if it's his way out humour or his technical skill skill or whatever but one of my all time favourites is Dali who, setting aside his bizarre persona, I regard as nothing short of a genius. I would place him miles ahead of most of the other greats whether traditional impressionist or modern. And yet others will vehemently disagree.
As for the Mona Lisa I am afraid that whilst it is undoubtedly a good painting I would only place it in the 'OK' category - it's not something I would go out of my way to see. Give me a Bruegal or a Kapoor or a Wesson anyday! How's that for a bit of diversity?'
I guess most 'masterpieces' achieve the status by fashion, reputation, exposure, and constant 'marketing' by critics, pundits etc whether intentional or otherwise. We all end up being brain washed and either accept or believe it!
So yes - art is in the eye of the beholder.
Posted
A good composition helps to make an interesting painting, this book is worth reading:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Simple-Secret-Better-Painting/dp/1581802560
An explanation of the techniques and styles used in good paintings is harder to find. There's plenty of sites on the internet with titles like the "best ten paintings in the world". the paintings will be displayed but there may not be an explanation. Also, does the author knows enough about the subject for you to trust what he or she writes?
It might be better looking for a suitable book on the subject. How about this one:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/50-Paintings-You-Should-Know/dp/3791341987#customerReviews